Mankind's last hope

In my dream last night: Explaining a group that consciousness should also be included in our knowledge acquisition model, because it is also changing things. Now it makes the model excluding itself. You see where that leaves us if it is not included in the model? That only the Self can really know. That knowing also is knowing itself. So our goal should be Self, because only Self can know the world really. The conscious alone is knowing how it is disturbing reality. It's like the media, the media is not reporting on things but is creating the news. We are still not toilet trained in our thinking. this is Mankind's last hope. If not we are creating a world but experiencing it as "out there" but talking no responsibility for it. Our only hope is superposition via touching the shadow -> to connect to Self. Epistemologically Self is the only point that can know really.

It is easier for a Camel to pass through the eye of a needle because the Kingdom of heaven is within

"If those who lead you say to you: See, the kingdom is in heaven, then the birds of the heaven will go before you; if they say to you: It is in the sea, then the fish will go before you. But the kingdom is within you, and it is outside of you.When you know yourselves, then you will be known, and you will know that you are the sons of the living Father. But if you do not know yourselves, then you are in poverty, and you are poverty."

In this saying in the gospel of Thomas lies the key to the meaning of the parable of the rich man. 

The same way what u don't deal with inside will appear outside, what u don't look for outside will show up within. The reason it is easier for a Camel to pass through the eye of a needle is because the Kingdom of heaven is within u. We found this in the world of drug abuse. The body can make any psychotropic agent itself...is wired with all possible endogenous receptor systems. But what was found, was that the more it is relied upon externally, the more the body will not make it internally. The rich man in the parable is simply the one who overly depends on external things to provide feelings of happiness and bliss due to which the real inner bliss will not be made and generated within. The less u look for without the more u will find within. 

The Rich Man explained: Rich man Poor man

But as explained below, this cuts on both sides. For the other side of abstaining fully is also looking outside for redemption. The rich man in the parable represents both ways. This is why both those who fully deny it all like those sacred men in india and both the money/power addict are both the rich man.

It is going inward that the true faculties are grown. nature creates from within. We are the tree of life which has grown barren. Cats can see in the dark. The light comes from within the eyes. In the animal kingdom we find these special faculties. Animals are deeply telepathic. 

So should be noted again as stated often in the past that this is not a matter of full abstinence as in depriving oneself fully. Because also in this we find the trap of fully avoiding something is also being fully possessed by it. Going on a virtual starvation diet is just as obsessive as being a food addict. We can only really focus inward when in between attachment and detachment. The eastern concept of detachment is not what we in the West make of it. It is finding the middle way in between too detached and too attached. This is why celibacy in the church couldn't work an why it has lead to mass sexual abuse of minors by priests. The Self which is the kingdom is accessed only in superposition, when we contain the opposites of detachment and attachment. When we fight or deny something the attention is still external. Either way we are still caught on the mental checkered board or reactivity.

 This is why many suchlike sayings have been misread:

“You might be poor, your shoes might be broken, but your mind is a palace.” 

― Frank McCourt, Angela's Ashes. Because we get traditions then which will make poverty and suffering the goal. In this sense the camel saying would also go for those who would want to make an aversion of money the new goal. To a large degree this is how the church misinterpreted the teachings.

Non Nondual

Going inward is when we are neither too attached or too detached, but not by denying them. When we touch the shadow we contain either pole and this is what opens the portal to Self. We will not be able to do this via the conscious directly. Only via a confrontation of the conscious with its shadow we get a moment of union of opposites. Anything else is either nonduality or a denial of the poles or a rejection of the shadow.   

Lucifer, Plastic & Candle Light

Choice is not yet free will or thus Will. Lucifer rebelled which is; exerted choice. But rebelling is not yet free will or free choice. It is still reactive. This is why till today what he does is mimic and curse god. he is caught in a reactive mode. wanting yo be bigger than Father. caught in extreme grandiosity/inflation. But Choice can thus be used against you too. Just look at political elections and or how propaganda is used to make u choose. 

This is why what is now called democracy is not real. It is not based on real free will, or what the people truly want from within. It is the manufacture of dissent and consent. The conditions aren't vouched for, for true Self, which is free Self to emerge. This was already found in the parable of the sower. For that we must become immune to external fanfare and soft bribing and threats. We must die to the surroundings to resurrect in Self which alone is free. it is a sensorial death. 

So Lucifer choose to rebel not to exert free will. And it is his Kingdom that the world has inherited. To the logical extreme of this time line, this self fully disconnects from source...becoming a plastic borglike creature living in a virtual Smart world or cartoon. The true sovereign stands for free will. Lucifer didn't realize that he was really rebelling against his own true source and Self. In the end all that will happen is that a large group...following this timeline will fully detach themselves from true source...and move out into a whole different plastic/virtual reality. It is inevitable because plastic cannot tolerate candle light. One thing is for sure. True Self and soul cannot survive in a plastic package/environment. The two time lines must separate.

Man of Steel - Archetypal Analysis

We are that society in which children are driven/programmed into roles from very young, which have nothing to do with their true soul code or purpose. Not permitted to become who they truly are. This educational model leads to a society where no one is on the right place, just doing what they do for the benefits and survival, not heartfelt. It really than eventually becomes a world unhinged from soul or true Self (true light)...fully synthetic neon light. A kind of upside down zombie resort model of treat every costumer good because big brother is watching u. The double entendre here is however that out of Krypton, which is this fully plastic external world which has been fully unhinged from natural self and nature; comes this savior figure or superman. Here we get the ironic oxymoron which is now currency in Hollywood. For out of this fully unhinged mechanical world comes this superman/super soldier which would be the only natural birth of that world and thus here we find the allusion and splice of this super hero with the true story of Jesus as the birth of the first real individual in a world which has now become fully neon green emerald city running on survivalist hunger games programs and thus where true Self is practically eradicated...everybody pimped or puppeteered. They try here thus to splice the archetype of the true savior with the super soldier archetype of the antichrist which would be the impersonator savior being sent from the underworld which is exactly what Krypton would represent. A similar splice of the true and the false time line is found in the Movie Oblivion, making it hard to discern the super soldier from the true savior or Self-archetype.

By Dimitri Halley

The Ultimate Trick the Ego Plays to Remain in Control

"Those who most criticize, fight and feel they should, or even worse, have killed the ego are most possessed by it. This goes for everything and very much fits the simile of the NWO which would be the collective equivalent of the ego in terms of global psycho-politics. The ego's ultimmate trick is to get you to try to kill it. For instance making you look for help to kill it or fight it. Making u kill the ego is a way to get you to over attach to it in reverse.

Either way you are over attaching to it, being distracted out of yourself and thus loosing yourself in the process. This goes for any addiction, evil or the devil and is also for what is now referred to as the New World Order or the Illuminati. Either when you are overattachmed to something or overly rejecting and against it (fight) you are outside yourself and loose center. In a last video I referred to it as the temple and guarding the temple.

The moment we focus too much on anything outside of us we are distracted and we loose center or are outside of the temple in which state we are remote controlable from outside. Toward moderate levels of this we find the addictions (fighting and obsessed with something is also a form of dependency) and toward extremes of this we get the symbol of the zombie where what we find is a vacant shell. In this vein the whole idea of fighting darkness for instance is also a form of being possessed by it. The most important thing is to guard the Temple."

By Dimitri Halley